Ethical Issues in Addiction Counselling

honorable Issues in habituation CounsellingEthical Issues in Addiction CounselingAlthough counselors and psychologists remain think in their schoolmaster person ethics by companioning honest standards which argon similar this is non the case in copion counselling because counselors merging different situations due to the nature of their counselees. O deal with this ch tout ensembleenge is consequently imperative for the counselors to work towards realizing their estimable standards based on ethical standards of the counselor-at-law art (Scott 2000). There atomic number 18 six unique ethical issues to be analyzed fully. The addiction treatment is non therapeutic as many another(prenominal) processes psychology for it tends to be base more on faith than the scientific entree. The research existence undertaken currently suggests that thither is more research on the field of addiction and scientists have almost come into conclusion that addiction is a brain complai nt. Chemicals and their exposure to the brain is the main cause of addiction. Scott goes come on to argue that drunkards recovering from alcoholism argon not normal adequacy since the alcohol affects cognitive reasoning. However, the main problem is that many psychologists are d considerably not to connect alcoholism with clinical research to determine the interrelationship. This bloodline has elements of truth in tit because you knack up find that the practitioner rarely you im grapheme find them in touch with the research hence link is vital to addictive counselors and counselees. The greatest enemy to the promotion of integrated approach in harmonizing theory, research and clinical practice is tradition. Many practitioners think they know much from their experience and they hold on to the past ways of doing it. This is a clear indication of ignorance. For those who can not work within the disease impersonate are advised to change to other forms of reformation to resi stance many drug dependent from leaving the counseling censure. The addicts whom refuse to follow the classic disease model are said to be in denial or even adamant to change. Instead of forcing invitees, to ways that they do not exchangeable the counselors should be open minded and use the useable methods. Hence, imperative to be open to look at the treatment model and whether it works or not and device new ways.Another very classic point that affects Counseling addictions is the failure for professionals to agree on who is fit to care for these cases. Since this research is more complicated it requires advanced development which lacks with many addict counselors. The idea of uniformity rather than individualized training aimed at tackling the problems as per addict.Moreover there is questionable propensity of multitude work or ag convention work. Since the professionals are not enough in this field then groups like Alcoholics Anonymous have come to aid their fellow alcoholi cs and they offer group approach counseling. With their dark past many of these addicts could have cognitive worsening because of using drugs and may develop anti friendly behavior hence pass on not be in position to fit in the group discussion. Furthermore, there is confidentiality and the federal laws are tougher on addictive law than the states this is restrain to encourage addicts to feel free to go for counseling without fear of being apprehended..In addition there should be clear cut demarcation amid who gives the go ahead for counseling. Although, many of these decisions are made by large number who are not sound it is advisable for the government to avoid forcing addicts to counseling like the law that incase you are caught driving and drunk you expect Alcoholics Anonymous. Incase the counselor finds the customer is not responsive it is the ethical office of the counselor to stop the process otherwise there is no desire to squander the customers money without results .In conclusion this article is intellectual because it has selled paramount ethical issues affecting addiction counseling and the way forward.Ethics in Substance abuse RehabilitationMost union abuse practitioners are persons that are in recovery which means that this practitioners may have control training in ethics thus they may encounter problems turn trying to recognizing ethical dilemmas while in practice. This field lacks a framework within which it works consistently. In the past ethical problems in bone marrow abuse were resolved using professional codes of practice of other palm e.g. medicine. However practitioners often feel that ethics is more of a in the flesh(predicate) issue thus organizations have been helping support practitioners sense of mortality and professional behavior through laws, regulations etc. Practitioners come from various training backgrounds which in turn affects their ethical background Howeverarticulate ethics and values can help improve a nd guide professional conduct.A clear set of standards and ethical framework may help practitioners clarify case management decisions and growing their competence in serving the guests because without a clear set of ethical standards for practice counselors may feel the pressure to comply with particular set of beliefs, causes etc. However a major setback undermining the achievement of sizable conduct is that many therapists are refusing to be part of any worldwide program evaluation.The main aim of code of ethics according to Kerry in code of ethics is to entertain the health of the client by position down standards of quality, provide guidance for professional behavior and also to protect and promote the professional identity and integrity of a profession. Ethical rules of rehabilitation counseling include Autonomy which refers to independence, freedom and the capacity for self governance. States that the client should have autonomous voice in his/her treatment enabling him/ her to make decisions. Beneficence which is an ethical principal that emphasizes an obligation to promote client welfare. Clients interests should be in a higher place the counselors. Non munificence refers to acting in a manner that does not harm the client. Rehabilitation counseling should function within the limits of the counselors role, training and good competence and only on positions for which counselors are professionally qualified. Justice rule requires practitioners to treat clients fairly e.g. in the allocation of monies, resources and time. Also in the charging of professional service.Fidelity principle focuses on loyalty and honesty in professional relationships amongst councilors and clients, colleagues among others. It includes protection of clients personal affirmation. Ethical dilemma exists when two or more ethical principle values come into conflict and suggest argue variants of action..In conclusion findings of this article are scholarly in that they clea rly commemorate that substance abuse treatment field is rapidly changing. Treatment facilities are attempting to individualize therapy to meet the needs of a diverse clientele by increasing the menu of treatment options, while more and more counselors are entering the field with less mentoring and limited training in ethics. Ethical practitioners are becoming more and more aware of the contextual forces in the profession that influences their ethical practices.Confidentiality in Substance Abuse CounselingConfidentiality has been delimitate in The loving Work Dictionary as A principle of ethics according to which the friendly worker or other professional may not disclose information about a client without the clients consent. This information includes the identity of the client, content of overt verbalizations, professional opinions about the client, and literal from the records. In specific circumstances, social workers and other professionals may be compelled by law to reveal to designated authorities some information ( such as threats of violence, billing of crimes, and suspected child abuse) that would be relevant to legal judgments.In the 1996 revision, confidentiality is highlighted in cardinal specific areas of practice with clients, with colleagues, and in research. In Section 1.07 of the current Social Work Code of Ethics cardinal different categories of responsibility social workers have towards their clients confidentiality are outlined .The fact that there are eighteen provisions, more than any other area in the code, demonstrates the importance of confidentiality to the profession of social work. These points specifically address what is considered confidential material, with whom and when that material can be released, and when and how this information should be explained to clients. Specific highlights include Social workers have authorization to disclose information only with the proper consent of the client. Social workers should infor m clients about confidentiality, and when and to whom disclosure is appropriate. Social workers cannot disclose information to thirdly companionship payers without consent of the client. Social workers should not discuss confidential information unless cover can be assured. Confidentiality should be maintained in a scientific office that includes computers, faxes, and cellular phones.Exceptions to confidentiality there are times in the course of the client-worker relationship that the client may voluntarily rescind confidentiality. There are other times where confidentiality is not legally binding on the social worker. These circumstances relate to safety of the client or others. Important issues cogitate to confidentiality include client consent, duty to warn, and privileged communication. Consent. There are many times where it would be beneficial for a social worker to talk to others who are involved in the clients life. This might focus on obtaining third party reimbursemen t, additional history, collateral collaboration, court testimony or communion information with other service providers. With managed care, clients generally want reassurance that their sessions will be covered, but that only the minimum amount of information is provided to the insurance alliance (Corcoran Winslade, 1994). Therefore, clients often allow social workers to release information to insurance providers, including diagnosis and treatment plans, but rely on workers to not divulge either aspect of their drug and/or alcohol use.A second occasion when a social worker may seek a clients consent is in pursuing additional history from collateral sources or corroboration of information. This will occur primarily during initial assessment however, it might take organise later during the treatment process. For instance,when a client is admitted to a psychiatric unit, there may be a need for additional information such as family history of psychiatric disorders or substance abus e, the precipitating event, or the clients current living arrangements. Such additional information, usually provided by a family member, may be beneficial in making an assessment and verificatory a clients information. Findings of confidentiality in substance abuse counseling are scholarly in that it shows how applying the standard confidentiality rules for basic social work practice is not adequate or acceptable when working with substance abusing clients and may well cause legal and ethical difficulties. Comparison is most exhibited in the above articles mostly in the way of addressing practitioners know how which is clearly a check in effective counseling. All articles point out reluctance on part of therapists in observing ethics code. Also all three articles address ethical issues in counseling. Furthermore all articles observe the importance of practitioners to observe code of ethics. All three articles support each other.Information in all the articles can be synthesized in terms of observing substance councelling which is discussed in all the articles. This can address all issues brought forward in addiction councelling. By broadly talking about ethical issues in substance addiction councelling, this will address all concerns.