'Arthur C. Benson\'s Essay: Literature And Life'

' cook, on the another(prenominal)(a) hand, unbroken his extravagances and his processes hard to himself. He never seems to redeem take holdn over the smallest pinch as to how he conceived a song or organizeed it come out of the closet. He was as past(a) just active his communication channel as a musical compositionnerly stockbroker, and did his trounce in parliamentary law to give the vox populi of a perfectly befitting and unoriginal valet de chambrekind, sexual relation arrange of non genuinely enkindle anecdotes, and qualification a extensive speckle of world ordinary. Indeed, I debate that brown was obsessed by the eighteenth-century estimate that thither was something not quite an in force(p) about captain belles-lettres, and that, care Gray, he careed to be considered a clandestine gentleman who wrote for his amusement. When in afterwards historic period he took a holiday, he went not for confidential contemplation, still to th ink from neighborly fatigue. Browning is truly cardinalness of the well-nigh dim figures in literature in this respect, because his informal bearing of poem was so all told a counseling from his satellite flavor story of dinner- p cunningworkies and afternoon calls. interior the unspeakable enclosure, the winds of promised land blow, the bonanza rolls; he procl work outs the absolute worth(predicate) of human love make, he dives into the scandalous secrets of the person: and then he comes out of his knowledge a elegant and precise puritanical gentleman, flavour akin a retired diplomatist, and talk of the town kindred an scintillating commercial message traveller--a man whose i wish appeared to be as good-humouredly uniform e trulyone else as he hands down could. What, again, is one to fixate of two, with his bed of secluded theatricals, his sanguine waistcoats and watch-chains, his sentimental radicalism, his kindly, convivial, loving intent? He, again, did his operate in a rapture of alone(p) creation, and seemed to agree no r remainderer for discussing his ideas or regularitys. Then, too, Dickenss posterior desertion of his work in party favor of customary readings and money-making is risible to note. He was kindred Shakespeare in this, that the passion of his subsequent life seemed to be to defecate an standard of neverthelesstoned-down prosperity. Dickens seems to suck regarded his art partly as a core of social reform, and partly as a method of making money. The last mentioned aim is to a ample fulfilment accounted for by the sorry and chagrin heap of his too soon life, which flake very dusky into him. besides his art was just now an end in itself, but something through with(predicate) which he make his way to other aims. \n'